Renault 70-14 SP or Renault 90 S?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 70-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 90 S has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 70-14 SP suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (4.9 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 24% (555 kg / 1,224 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Renault 70-14 SP suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 70% (1,260 kg / 2,778 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The Renault 70-14 SP suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 70-14 SP and Renault 90 S, with the call on each
Question70-14 SP90 SCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 90 S has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 70-14 SP and the 90 S.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 70-14 SP and the 90 S.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.1 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”27.2 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”AheadThe Renault 70-14 SP has 18% more hydraulic flow (4.9 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault 90 S (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”2,315 kg (5,104 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”AheadThe Renault 70-14 SP has 24% more lift (555 kg / 1,224 lb) than the Renault 90 S (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 70-14 SP is 70% heavier (1,260 kg / 2,778 lb) than the Renault 90 S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 90 S.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”8 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 70-14 SP and the 90 S.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”AheadThe Renault 70-14 SP has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 90 S (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”AheadThe Renault 70-14 SP offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 90 S does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 90 S.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 90S R7396”AheadThe Renault 70-14 SP is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 90 S is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19891979–1984Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 70-14 SP is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 70-14 SP has 18% more hydraulic flow (4.9 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault 90 S (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 70-14 SP has 24% more lift (555 kg / 1,224 lb) than the Renault 90 S (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 70-14 SP is 70% heavier (1,260 kg / 2,778 lb) than the Renault 90 S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 70-14 SP has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 90 S (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 70-14 SP offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 90 S does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 70-14 SP is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 90 S is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 70-14 SP is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 90 S has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources