Renault 70-14 SP or Renault 70-34 PX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 70-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 70-14 SP and Renault 70-34 PX, with the call on each
Question70-14 SP70-34 PXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 70-14 SP and the 70-34 PX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 70-14 SP and the 70-34 PX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.1 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”32.1 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”3,230 kg (7,121 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 70-14 SP and the 70-34 PX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 SP R3132”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19891989–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources