Renault 70-14 LB or VALMET 4400?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 70-14 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 70-14 LB suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (625 kg / 1,378 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 70-14 LB and VALMET 4400, with the call on each
Question70-14 LB4400Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 70-14 LB and the 4400.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 70-14 LB and the 4400.
Which pumps more oil for implements?37.2 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,480 kg (7,672 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”2,855 kg (6,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”AheadThe Renault 70-14 LB has 22% more lift (625 kg / 1,378 lb) than the VALMET 4400 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4400 is 12% heavier (290 kg / 639 lb) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4400.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 70-14 LB and the 4400.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”AheadThe Renault 70-14 LB offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 4400 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 70-14 LB.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–19991993–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 70-14 LB has 22% more lift (625 kg / 1,378 lb) than the VALMET 4400 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4400 is 12% heavier (290 kg / 639 lb) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 70-14 LB offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 4400 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources