Renault 70-14 F or VALMET 4400?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 70-14 F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 70-14F suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 22% (625 kg / 1,378 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 70-14 F and VALMET 4400, with the call on each
Question70-14 F4400Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 70-14 F and the 4400.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 70-14 F and the 4400.
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.3 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”AheadThe Renault 70-14F has 11% more hydraulic flow (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the VALMET 4400 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,480 kg (7,672 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”2,855 kg (6,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”AheadThe Renault 70-14F has 22% more lift (625 kg / 1,378 lb) than the VALMET 4400 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,160 kg (4,762 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4400 is 29% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Renault 70-14F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 70-14 F and the 4400.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 70-14 F and the 4400.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 70-14 F.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 F R3268”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19991993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4400 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 70-14F has 11% more hydraulic flow (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the VALMET 4400 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 70-14F has 22% more lift (625 kg / 1,378 lb) than the VALMET 4400 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4400 is 29% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Renault 70-14F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4400 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-14 F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources