Renault 60 Vigneron or Renault 60 S-Vigneron?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 60 S-Vigneron: hydraulic flow and three-point lift.
- The Renault 60 S-Vigneron suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 47% (795 kg / 1,753 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 60 Vigneron | 60 S-Vigneron | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 28.6 kW (38.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 30.6 kW (41.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 60 Vigneron and the 60 S-Vigneron. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 60 Vigneron and the 60 S-Vigneron. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.3 L/min (5.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 26.2 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | AheadThe Renault 60 S-Vigneron has 29% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,675 kg (3,693 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 2,470 kg (5,445 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | AheadThe Renault 60 S-Vigneron has 47% more lift (795 kg / 1,753 lb) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,530 kg (3,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 1,635 kg (3,605 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 60 Vigneron and the 60 S-Vigneron. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 60 Vigneron and the 60 S-Vigneron. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60S R7375” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1968–1977 | 1976–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 60 S-Vigneron is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 60 S-Vigneron has 29% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 60 S-Vigneron has 47% more lift (795 kg / 1,753 lb) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 60 S-Vigneron is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources