Renault 58 vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-45 A
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 58 and the WT-45 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 58 | WT-45 A | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 44.4 hp | 44.4 hp | — |
| Engine declared | RENAULT 671/9 | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-154 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.14 L | 2.52 L | +18% WT-45 A |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 124 lb·ft · 168 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +20% WT-45 A |
| Clutch declared | Two-stage pedal operated dry FERODO double clutch | Pedal-operated, two-stage dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 4,409 lb · 2,000 kg | 3,968 lb · 1,800 kg | +11% 58 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,123 lb · 1,870 kg | 4,299 lb · 1,950 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 76.0 in · 1,930 mm | 79.3 in · 2,015 mm | — |
| Length declared | 128.0 in · 3,250 mm | 131.9 in · 3,350 mm | — |
| Width declared | 59.1 in · 1,500 mm | 61.0 in · 1,550 mm | — |
| Height declared | 61.0 in · 1,550 mm | 57.5 in · 1,460 mm | +6% 58 |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.4 in · 390 mm | 15.4 in · 390 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 58.1 qt · 55.0 L | 43.3 qt · 41.0 L | +34% 58 |
Renault 58 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58 R7291”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051”
WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-45 A sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 45 A”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-414”