Renault 58-34 MX or WHITE 2-55?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 58-34 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 58-34 MX suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 58-34 MX | 2-55 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 58-34 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 58-34 MX and the 2-55. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 58-34 MX and the 2-55. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 32.3 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-55. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | 1,655 kg (3,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 58-34 MX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112”); the 2-55: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,070 kg (6,768 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | 2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 58-34 MX is 33% heavier (770 kg / 1,698 lb) than the WHITE 2-55 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2-55. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 58-34 MX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | AheadThe Renault 58-34 MX has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the WHITE 2-55 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | AheadThe Renault 58-34 MX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-55 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 58-34 MX and the 2-55. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-55” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1989–1993 | 1982–1988 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 58-34 MX is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 58-34 MX is 33% heavier (770 kg / 1,698 lb) than the WHITE 2-55 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 58-34 MX has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the WHITE 2-55 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 58-34 MX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-55 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 58-34 MX is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 58-34 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 58-34 MX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3112”); the 2-55: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-55”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources