Renault 58-12 LS or Renault 58-14 LS?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 58-12 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 58-14 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 58-14 LS suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 14% (360 kg / 794 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 58-12 LS and Renault 58-14 LS, with the call on each
Question58-12 LS58-14 LSCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 58-12 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 58-14 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 58-12 LS and the 58-14 LS.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 58-12 LS and the 58-14 LS.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.3 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”32.3 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 58-14 LS is 14% heavier (360 kg / 794 lb) than the Renault 58-12 LS (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 58-12 LS and the 58-14 LS.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 58-14 LS.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-12 LS R3111”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 58-14 LS R3112”AheadThe Renault 58-14 LS is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 58-12 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–19891987–1989EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 58-14 LS is 14% heavier (360 kg / 794 lb) than the Renault 58-12 LS (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 58-14 LS is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 58-12 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 58-12 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 58-14 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources