Renault R-56 or VALMET 361 D?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-56 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault R-56 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 48% (650 kg / 1,433 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The VALMET 361 D suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault R-56 and VALMET 361 D, with the call on each
QuestionR-56361 DCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-56 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-56 and the 361 D.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-56 and the 361 D.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the R-56.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”1,350 kg (2,976 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”AheadThe Renault R-56 has 48% more lift (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the VALMET 361 D (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”1,770 kg (3,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-56 and the 361 D.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”6Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-56 and the 361 D.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”AheadThe VALMET 361 D has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault R-56 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 361 D.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19731960–1965Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault R-56 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault R-56 has 48% more lift (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the VALMET 361 D (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 361 D has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault R-56 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault R-56 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-56 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources