Renault 53 vs WHITE 2-30

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Renault 53

1967–1973

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

WHITE 2-30

1979–1984

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 53 and the 2-30 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

7 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Renault 53 and WHITE 2-30, field by field
Field532-30Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed27.6 hp26.7 hp
Transmission
Top speed declared15.5 mph · 25 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/h+20% 2-30
Clutch declaredPedal-operated dry FERODO double clutch type 10 LFM 24
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredOpen centre
Pump flow declared6.6 gpm · 25.0 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared4,409 lb · 2,000 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,527 lb · 1,600 kg2,624 lb · 1,190 kg+34% 53
Wheelbase declared70.9 in · 1,800 mm69.0 in · 1,753 mm
Length declared123.6 in · 3,140 mm122.0 in · 3,099 mm
Width declared57.5 in · 1,460 mm67.0 in · 1,702 mm+17% 2-30
Height declared60.6 in · 1,540 mm79.0 in · 2,007 mm+30% 2-30
Ground clearance declared16.5 in · 420 mm14.0 in · 356 mm+18% 53
Turning radius, braked declared11.3 ft · 3.45 m8.8 ft · 2.67 m+29% 53
Fuel tank declared58.1 qt · 55.0 L31.7 qt · 30.0 L+83% 53

Renault 53 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 53 R7211”

WHITE 2-30 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-30”