Renault 50-12 LB or UTB U-453 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 50-12 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-453 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 50-12 LB suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 31% (510 kg / 1,124 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The UTB U-453 DT suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 45% (895 kg / 1,973 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The Renault 50-12 LB suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 50-12 LB and UTB U-453 DT, with the call on each
Question50-12 LBU-453 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 50-12 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-453 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 50-12 LB and the U-453 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 50-12 LB and the U-453 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?42.1 L/min (11.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”AheadThe Renault 50-12 LB has 24% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the UTB U-453 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,140 kg (4,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”1,630 kg (3,594 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”AheadThe Renault 50-12 LB has 31% more lift (510 kg / 1,124 lb) than the UTB U-453 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,005 kg (4,420 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-453 DT is 45% heavier (895 kg / 1,973 lb) than the Renault 50-12 LB (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,260 kg (9,392 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-453 DT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”12Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 50-12 LB.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”AheadThe Renault 50-12 LB has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the UTB U-453 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”AheadThe UTB U-453 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 50-12 LB does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-453 DT.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 50-12 LB R3201”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”AheadThe UTB U-453 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 50-12 LB is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–19931988–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 50-12 LB has 24% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the UTB U-453 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 50-12 LB has 31% more lift (510 kg / 1,124 lb) than the UTB U-453 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-453 DT is 45% heavier (895 kg / 1,973 lb) than the Renault 50-12 LB (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 50-12 LB has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the UTB U-453 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-453 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 50-12 LB does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The UTB U-453 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 50-12 LB is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 50-12 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-453 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources