Renault 460 S-Vigneron or Renault 60 Vigneron?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 460 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 60 Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 47% (795 kg / 1,753 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 21% (315 kg / 694 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 460 S-Vigneron and Renault 60 Vigneron, with the call on each
Question460 S-Vigneron60 VigneronCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”33.9 kW (45.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 460 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 60 Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 460 S-Vigneron and the 60 Vigneron.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 460 S-Vigneron and the 60 Vigneron.
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.2 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”20.3 L/min (5.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”AheadThe Renault 460 S-Vigneron has 29% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,470 kg (5,445 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”1,675 kg (3,693 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”AheadThe Renault 460 S-Vigneron has 47% more lift (795 kg / 1,753 lb) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,845 kg (4,068 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”1,530 kg (3,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 460 S-Vigneron is 21% heavier (315 kg / 694 lb) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 460 S-Vigneron and the 60 Vigneron.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 460 S-Vigneron and the 60 Vigneron.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”AheadThe Renault 460 S-Vigneron is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 60 Vigneron is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19811968–1977Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 460 S-Vigneron is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron has 29% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron has 47% more lift (795 kg / 1,753 lb) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron is 21% heavier (315 kg / 694 lb) than the Renault 60 Vigneron (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 60 Vigneron is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 460 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 60 Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources