Renault 385 / R 78 or Steyr 768 (a)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 768 (a): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears, top speed, PTO speeds and drive.
- The Steyr 768 (a) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Steyr 768 (a) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 60% (900 kg / 1,984 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Steyr 768 (a) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Steyr 768 (a) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 385 / R 78 | 768 (a) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.2 kW (52.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 39.3 kW (52.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 385 / R 78 and the 768 (a). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 385 / R 78 and the 768 (a). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | AheadThe Steyr 768 (a) has 31% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | AheadThe Steyr 768 (a) has 60% more lift (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,639 kg (5,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 2,560 kg (5,644 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 385 / R 78 and the 768 (a). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | AheadThe Steyr 768 (a) has 60% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 385 / R 78 and the 768 (a). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | AheadThe Steyr 768 (a) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | AheadThe Steyr 768 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 385 / R 78 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 385 / R 78 and the 768 (a). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 78” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 768” | AheadThe Steyr 768 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 385 / R 78 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1963–1967 | 1977–1979 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 768 (a) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 768 (a) has 31% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 768 (a) has 60% more lift (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 768 (a) has 60% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 768 (a) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 385 / R 78 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 768 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 385 / R 78 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Steyr 768 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 385 / R 78 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Steyr 768 (a) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources