Renault 32-50 V or SOMECA 474 DT/V?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 32-50 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 474 DT/V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The SOMECA 474 DT/V suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (6.6 L/min / 1.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The SOMECA 474 DT/V suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Renault 32-50V suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 32-50 V | 474 DT/V | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 33.8 kW (45.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 32-50 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 474 DT/V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 32-50 V and the 474 DT/V. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 32-50 V and the 474 DT/V. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 29.4 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | AheadThe SOMECA 474 DT/V has 22% more hydraulic flow (6.6 L/min / 1.7 gpm) than the Renault 32-50V (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 474 DT/V. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,705 kg (3,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 1,655 kg (3,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 32-50 V and the 474 DT/V. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 9Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 32-50 V and the 474 DT/V. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | AheadThe Renault 32-50V has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the SOMECA 474 DT/V (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 474 V” | AheadThe SOMECA 474 DT/V is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 32-50V is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1986 | 1978–1985 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 32-50V is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SOMECA 474 DT/V has 22% more hydraulic flow (6.6 L/min / 1.7 gpm) than the Renault 32-50V (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 32-50V has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the SOMECA 474 DT/V (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The SOMECA 474 DT/V is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 32-50V is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 32-50V is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 32-50 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 474 DT/V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources