Renault 32-50 V or Renault 460 S-Vigneron?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 32-50 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 460 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 32-50V suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (3.2 L/min / 0.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
  • The Renault 32-50V suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 32-50 V and Renault 460 S-Vigneron, with the call on each
Question32-50 V460 S-VigneronCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 32-50 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 460 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 32-50 V and the 460 S-Vigneron.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 32-50 V and the 460 S-Vigneron.
Which pumps more oil for implements?29.4 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”26.2 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”AheadThe Renault 32-50V has 12% more hydraulic flow (3.2 L/min / 0.8 gpm) than the Renault 460 S-Vigneron (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”2,470 kg (5,445 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,705 kg (3,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”1,845 kg (4,068 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 32-50 V and the 460 S-Vigneron.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 32-50 V and the 460 S-Vigneron.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”AheadThe Renault 32-50V has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 460 S-Vigneron (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 32-50 V/EV R7375”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 460S R7377”AheadThe Renault 460 S-Vigneron is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 32-50V is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19861976–1981Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 32-50V is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 32-50V has 12% more hydraulic flow (3.2 L/min / 0.8 gpm) than the Renault 460 S-Vigneron (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 32-50V has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 460 S-Vigneron (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 460 S-Vigneron is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 32-50V is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 32-50V is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 32-50 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 460 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources