Renault 301 vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1972–1977

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1968–1971

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 301 and the WT-32 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Renault 301 and WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B, field by field
Field	301	WT-32 B	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	29.6 hp	29.6 hp	—
Engine declared	MWM D 327-2	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144	differs
Displacement declared	1.88 L	2.36 L	+25% WT-32 B
Maximum torque declared	83 lb·ft · 113 N·m	105 lb·ft · 142 N·m	+26% WT-32 B
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% WT-32 B
Clutch declared	Dry Verto double clutch	Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	5.7 gpm · 21.7 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,497 lb · 2,040 kg	3,968 lb · 1,800 kg	+13% 301
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,770 lb · 1,710 kg	3,417 lb · 1,550 kg	+10% 301
Wheelbase declared	73.0 in · 1,854 mm	77.6 in · 1,970 mm	+6% WT-32 B
Length declared	125.4 in · 3,184 mm	128.3 in · 3,260 mm	—
Width declared	66.1 in · 1,680 mm	60.2 in · 1,530 mm	+10% 301
Height declared	60.6 in · 1,540 mm	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	15.6 in · 395 mm	+13% WT-32 B
Turning radius, braked declared	9.8 ft · 3.00 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	50.7 qt · 48.0 L	38.0 qt · 36.0 L	+33% 301

Source

Source