Renault 160-94 TZ/TX or URSUS 1.604?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 160-94 TZ/TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.604 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 107% (5,697 kg / 12,560 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX suits road haulage better on this data: 60% (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 160-94 TZ/TX | 1.604 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 160-94 TZ/TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.604 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 160-94 TZ/TX and the 1.604. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 160-94 TZ/TX and the 1.604. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.7 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1.604. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 11,020 kg (24,295 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 5,323 kg (11,735 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | AheadThe Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 107% more lift (5,697 kg / 12,560 lb) than the URSUS 1.604 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,275 kg (13,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 4,910 kg (10,825 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX is 28% heavier (1,365 kg / 3,009 lb) than the URSUS 1.604 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,750 kg (21,495 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1.604. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 27Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | AheadThe Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 125% more forward gears (15 gears) than the URSUS 1.604 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 160-94 TZ/TX and the 1.604. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | AheadThe Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the URSUS 1.604 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | AheadThe Renault 160-94 TZ/TX offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 1.604 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 160-94 TZ/TX and the 1.604. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1997 | 1978–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 107% more lift (5,697 kg / 12,560 lb) than the URSUS 1.604 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX is 28% heavier (1,365 kg / 3,009 lb) than the URSUS 1.604 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 125% more forward gears (15 gears) than the URSUS 1.604 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the URSUS 1.604 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 1.604 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 160-94 TZ/TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.604 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources