Renault 155-54 TX or WHITE 2-150?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The WHITE 2-150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 76% (32.6 L/min / 8.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 155-54 TX and WHITE 2-150, with the call on each
Question155-54 TX2-150Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”108.1 kW (145.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 155-54 TX and the 2-150.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 155-54 TX and the 2-150.
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.1 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”75.7 L/min (20.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe WHITE 2-150 has 76% more hydraulic flow (32.6 L/min / 8.6 gpm) than the Renault 155-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 155-54 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”); the 2-150: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,750 kg (14,881 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”7,684 kg (16,940 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-150 is 14% heavier (934 kg / 2,059 lb) than the Renault 155-54 TX (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2-150.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 155-54 TX and the 2-150.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 155-54 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe Renault 155-54 TX is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-150 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19901974–1976Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 2-150 has 76% more hydraulic flow (32.6 L/min / 8.6 gpm) than the Renault 155-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The WHITE 2-150 is 14% heavier (934 kg / 2,059 lb) than the Renault 155-54 TX (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-150 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 155-54 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”); the 2-150: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources