Renault 155-54 TX or SAME Laser 150 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 150 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 155-54 TX and SAME Laser 150 DT, with the call on each
Question155-54 TXLaser 150 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”106.6 kW (143.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 150 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 155-54 TX and the Laser 150 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 155-54 TX and the Laser 150 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.1 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Laser 150 DT.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”5,080 kg (11,199 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 155-54 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”); the Laser 150 DT: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,750 kg (14,881 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”5,590 kg (12,324 lb) to 5,770 kg (12,721 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 155-54 TX is 17% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the SAME Laser 150 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 155-54 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 155-54 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19901983–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 155-54 TX is 17% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the SAME Laser 150 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 150 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 155-54 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”); the Laser 150 DT: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources