Renault 1451-4 or WHITE 2-150?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1451-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The WHITE 2-150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 99% (37.7 L/min / 10.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 1451-4 and WHITE 2-150, with the call on each
Question1451-42-150Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”108.1 kW (145.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1451-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1451-4 and the 2-150.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1451-4 and the 2-150.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”75.7 L/min (20.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe WHITE 2-150 has 99% more hydraulic flow (37.7 L/min / 10.0 gpm) than the Renault 1451-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,620 kg (10,185 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 1451-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”); the 2-150: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,970 kg (13,162 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”7,684 kg (16,940 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-150 is 29% heavier (1,714 kg / 3,779 lb) than the Renault 1451-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1451-4 and the 2-150.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2-150.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe WHITE 2-150 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 1451-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe Renault 1451-4 is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-150 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19801974–1976EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 2-150 has 99% more hydraulic flow (37.7 L/min / 10.0 gpm) than the Renault 1451-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The WHITE 2-150 is 29% heavier (1,714 kg / 3,779 lb) than the Renault 1451-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The WHITE 2-150 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 1451-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 1451-4 is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-150 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1451-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 1451-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”); the 2-150: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources