Renault 1451-4 or Renault 155-54 TX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1451-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 155-54 TX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (5.1 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 92% (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 1451-4 and Renault 155-54 TX, with the call on each
Question1451-4155-54 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1451-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1451-4 and the 155-54 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1451-4 and the 155-54 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”43.1 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”AheadThe Renault 155-54 TX has 13% more hydraulic flow (5.1 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault 1451-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,620 kg (10,185 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”AheadThe Renault 155-54 TX has 92% more lift (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) than the Renault 1451-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,970 kg (13,162 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”6,750 kg (14,881 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 155-54 TX is 13% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Renault 1451-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1451-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 155-54 TX.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”AheadThe Renault 155-54 TX offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 1451-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 155-54 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 1451-4 R7694”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19801989–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 155-54 TX has 13% more hydraulic flow (5.1 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault 1451-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX has 92% more lift (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) than the Renault 1451-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX is 13% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Renault 1451-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 1451-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1451-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources