Renault 133-54 TX or WHITE 125?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 133-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 133-54 TX | 125 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 90.5 kW (121.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 91.2 kW (122.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 125” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 133-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 133-54 TX and the 125. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 133-54 TX and the 125. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.1 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 83.3 L/min (22.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 125” | AheadThe WHITE 125 has 103% more hydraulic flow (42.2 L/min / 11.1 gpm) than the Renault 133-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 3,271 kg (7,211 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 125” | AheadThe Renault 133-54 TX has 171% more lift (5,579 kg / 12,300 lb) than the WHITE 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,120 kg (13,492 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 5,557 kg (12,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 125” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 133-54 TX is 10% heavier (563 kg / 1,241 lb) than the WHITE 125 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 125. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 125” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 133-54 TX and the 125. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 125” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 125” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 133-54 TX and the 125. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7932” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 125” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1989–1990 | 1990–1992 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 125 has 103% more hydraulic flow (42.2 L/min / 11.1 gpm) than the Renault 133-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 133-54 TX has 171% more lift (5,579 kg / 12,300 lb) than the WHITE 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 133-54 TX is 10% heavier (563 kg / 1,241 lb) than the WHITE 125 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 133-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources