Renault 133-14 TX or WHITE 2-110?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 133-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 133-14 TX and WHITE 2-110, with the call on each
Question133-14 TX2-110Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?90.5 kW (121.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”89.7 kW (120.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 133-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 133-14 TX and the 2-110.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 133-14 TX and the 2-110.
Which pumps more oil for implements?39.4 L/min (10.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-110.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,380 kg (9,656 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 133-14 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”); the 2-110: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,570 kg (12,280 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”5,530 kg (12,192 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 133-14 TX and the 2-110.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”AheadThe WHITE 2-110 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 133-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 133-14 TX and the 2-110.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 133-14 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19861982–1987EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 2-110 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 133-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 133-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 133-14 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932”); the 2-110: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources