Renault 106-14 SP or URSUS 1.002 / 1.004?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 106-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 106-14 SP suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (8.3 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 106-14 SP | 1.002 / 1.004 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 70.7 kW (94.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 70.6 kW (94.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 106-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 106-14 SP and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 106-14 SP and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.3 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | AheadThe Renault 106-14 SP has 26% more hydraulic flow (8.3 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 4,201 kg (9,262 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,715 kg (10,395 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 106-14 SP is 35% heavier (1,215 kg / 2,679 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 106-14 SP and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | AheadThe URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 106-14 SP (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 106-14 SP and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 106-14 SP and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 106-14 SP R7832” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1987 | 1984–2009 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 106-14 SP has 26% more hydraulic flow (8.3 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 106-14 SP is 35% heavier (1,215 kg / 2,679 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 106-14 SP (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 106-14 SP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources