Renault 103-52 TX vs ZETOR 12011/12045

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1989–1990

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1974–1984

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 103-52 TX and the 12011/12045 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Renault 103-52 TX and ZETOR 12011/12045, field by field
Field	103-52 TX	12011/12045	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	91.7 hp	113.5 hp	+24% 12011/12045
Engine declared	MWM TD 226-4	ZETOR Z-8601	differs
Displacement declared	4.16 L	6.84 L	+65% 12011/12045
Maximum torque declared	232 lb·ft · 314 N·m	276 lb·ft · 374 N·m	+19% 12011/12045
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry LuK double clutch	Pedal-operated dry Zetor single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	11.1 gpm · 42.0 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	13,669 lb · 6,200 kg	8,708 lb · 3,950 kg	+57% 103-52 TX
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,645 lb · 4,375 kg	9,182 lb · 4,165 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	99.1 in · 2,516 mm	106.1 in · 2,695 mm	+7% 12011/12045
Length declared	169.0 in · 4,292 mm	176.0 in · 4,470 mm	—
Width declared	80.1 in · 2,035 mm	87.6 in · 2,224 mm	+9% 12011/12045
Height declared	112.6 in · 2,860 mm	98.7 in · 2,506 mm	+14% 103-52 TX
Ground clearance declared	20.1 in · 510 mm	14.8 in · 375 mm	+36% 103-52 TX
Turning radius, braked declared	13.8 ft · 4.20 m	13.0 ft · 3.96 m	+6% 103-52 TX
Fuel tank declared	137.4 qt · 130.0 L	137.4 qt · 130.0 L	—

Source

Source