Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 or Volvo T-32?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Super L 318 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Volvo T-32 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 20% (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Volvo T-32 suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (3.8 km/h / 2.4 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Super L 318 | T-32 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.3 kW (39.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Super L 318 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Super L 318 and the T-32. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Super L 318 and the T-32. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 19.8 L/min (5.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 23.8 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | AheadThe Volvo T-32 has 20% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 850 kg (1,874 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,030 kg (4,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 2,295 kg (5,060 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T-32 is 13% heavier (265 kg / 584 lb) than the Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Super L 318 and the T-32. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | AheadThe Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Volvo T-32 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T-32. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19.4 km/h (12.1 mph) to 26.2 km/h (16.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | AheadThe Volvo T-32 has 15% more top speed (3.8 km/h / 2.4 mph) than the Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 565/1106 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Super L 318. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super L 318 and the T-32. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L 318” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 32” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1960–1961 | 1950–1957 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Volvo T-32 has 20% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T-32 is 13% heavier (265 kg / 584 lb) than the Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Volvo T-32 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T-32 has 15% more top speed (3.8 km/h / 2.4 mph) than the Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Porsche-Diesel Super L 318 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Super L 318 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources