OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) or WHITE 2270?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) and WHITE 2270, with the call on each
Question2255 (4 WD)2270Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?107.9 kW (144.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”106.4 kW (142.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2255 (4 WD) and the 2270.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2255 (4 WD) and the 2270.
Which pumps more oil for implements?75.7 L/min (20.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”75.7 L/min (20.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 2255 (4 WD): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”); the 2270: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,442 kg (16,407 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”7,754 kg (17,095 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2255 (4 WD) and the 2270.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2255 (4 WD) and the 2270.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2255 (4 WD) and the 2270.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 2270”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1972–19761972–1974EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 2255 (4 WD): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”); the 2270: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2270”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources