OLIVER 1870 or Renault 133-14 TX?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the OLIVER 1870: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears. On features, the Renault 133-14 TX is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.
- The Renault 133-14 TX suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
- The OLIVER 1870 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 68% (26.6 L/min / 7.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Renault 133-14 TX suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1870 | 133-14 TX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 73.7 kW (98.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 74.1 kW (99.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1870 and the 133-14 TX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1870 and the 133-14 TX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 39.4 L/min (10.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | AheadThe OLIVER 1870 has 68% more hydraulic flow (26.6 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Renault 133-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 4,380 kg (9,656 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1870. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,470 kg (12,059 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 5,570 kg (12,280 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1870 and the 133-14 TX. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | AheadThe OLIVER 1870 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 133-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1870 and the 133-14 TX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | AheadThe Renault 133-14 TX offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the OLIVER 1870 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1870 and the 133-14 TX. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 133-14 TS/TX R7932” | AheadThe Renault 133-14 TX is available with four-wheel drive; the OLIVER 1870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1974 | 1981–1986 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 133-14 TX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The OLIVER 1870 has 68% more hydraulic flow (26.6 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Renault 133-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The OLIVER 1870 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 133-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 133-14 TX offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the OLIVER 1870 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 133-14 TX is available with four-wheel drive; the OLIVER 1870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 133-14 TX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources