OLIVER 1465 or Renault 80-12 SP?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 80-12 SP: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears, top speed and PTO speeds. On features, the OLIVER 1465 is ahead on drive.
- The Renault 80-12 SP suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Renault 80-12 SP suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 36% (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 118% (2,470 kg / 5,445 lb) more three-point lift.
- The OLIVER 1465 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Renault 80-12 SP suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1465 | 80-12 SP | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.5 kW (69.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 50.9 kW (68.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1465 and the 80-12 SP. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1465 and the 80-12 SP. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 23.5 L/min (6.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | AheadThe Renault 80-12 SP has 36% more hydraulic flow (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the OLIVER 1465 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | AheadThe Renault 80-12 SP has 118% more lift (2,470 kg / 5,445 lb) than the OLIVER 1465 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,948 kg (6,499 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1465 and the 80-12 SP. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 7Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | AheadThe Renault 80-12 SP has 71% more forward gears (5 gears) than the OLIVER 1465 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1465 and the 80-12 SP. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | AheadThe Renault 80-12 SP has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the OLIVER 1465 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | AheadThe Renault 80-12 SP offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the OLIVER 1465 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1465 and the 80-12 SP. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-12 SP R3151” | AheadThe OLIVER 1465 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80-12 SP is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1975 | 1986–1989 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 80-12 SP is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 80-12 SP has 36% more hydraulic flow (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the OLIVER 1465 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-12 SP has 118% more lift (2,470 kg / 5,445 lb) than the OLIVER 1465 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-12 SP has 71% more forward gears (5 gears) than the OLIVER 1465 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-12 SP has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the OLIVER 1465 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-12 SP offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the OLIVER 1465 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The OLIVER 1465 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80-12 SP is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 80-12 SP is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources