Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) or Steyr 30?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. On features, the Steyr 30 is ahead on forward gears and top speed.

  • The Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 17% (184 kg / 406 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Steyr 30 suits road haulage better on this data: 40% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) and Steyr 30, with the call on each
QuestionUniversal-3 (3 DL)30Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?20.1 kW (26.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”20.5 kW (27.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Universal-3 (3 DL) and the 30.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Universal-3 (3 DL) and the 30.
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.3 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”21.2 L/min (5.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”AheadThe Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) has 29% more hydraulic flow (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Steyr 30 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,284 kg (2,831 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”AheadThe Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) has 17% more lift (184 kg / 406 lb) than the Steyr 30 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,092 kg (4,612 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”1,761 kg (3,882 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) is 19% heavier (331 kg / 730 lb) than the Steyr 30 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Universal-3 (3 DL).
Which has the wider choice of gears?5Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”8Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”AheadThe Steyr 30 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Universal-3 (3 DL) and the 30.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”AheadThe Steyr 30 has 40% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Universal-3 (3 DL).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 3 (1957-1961)”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr Plus 30”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1957–19611966–1976Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 30 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) has 29% more hydraulic flow (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Steyr 30 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) has 17% more lift (184 kg / 406 lb) than the Steyr 30 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) is 19% heavier (331 kg / 730 lb) than the Steyr 30 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 30 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 30 has 40% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Nuffield Universal-3 (3 DL) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 30 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources