Nuffield 3/45 (345) or VALMET 565?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 3/45 (345) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 565 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Nuffield 3/45 (345) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The VALMET 565 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Nuffield 3/45 (345) and VALMET 565, with the call on each
Question3/45 (345)565Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.5 kW (44.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”33.8 kW (45.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3/45 (345) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 565 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3/45 (345) and the 565.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3/45 (345) and the 565.
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”24.1 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”AheadThe Nuffield 3/45 (345) has 29% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the VALMET 565 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?907 kg (2,000 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”1,350 kg (2,976 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 3/45 (345): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”); the 565: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,340 kg (5,159 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”1,932 kg (4,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Nuffield 3/45 (345) is 21% heavier (408 kg / 899 lb) than the VALMET 565 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3/45 (345) and the 565.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”6Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”AheadThe Nuffield 3/45 (345) has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 565 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3/45 (345) and the 565.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”AheadThe VALMET 565 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Nuffield 3/45 (345) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 3/45 (345) and the 565.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19691964–1968EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Nuffield 3/45 (345) has 29% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the VALMET 565 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Nuffield 3/45 (345) is 21% heavier (408 kg / 899 lb) than the VALMET 565 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Nuffield 3/45 (345) has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 565 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 565 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Nuffield 3/45 (345) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3/45 (345) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 565 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 3/45 (345): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 3/45 (1967-1969)”); the 565: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 565”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources