Nuffield 10/42 or Renault R-57?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Nuffield 10/42: hydraulic flow.
- The Nuffield 10/42 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 10/42 | R-57 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 23.2 kW (31.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 23.3 kW (31.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 10/42 and the R-57. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 10/42 and the R-57. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 21.2 L/min (5.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | AheadThe Nuffield 10/42 has 65% more hydraulic flow (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Renault R-57 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 10/42. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,418 kg (5,331 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 1,860 kg (4,101 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Nuffield 10/42 is 30% heavier (558 kg / 1,230 lb) than the Renault R-57 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 10/42 and the R-57. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 10/42 and the R-57. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 10/42 (1964-1967)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1964–1967 | 1967–1972 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Nuffield 10/42 has 65% more hydraulic flow (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Renault R-57 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Nuffield 10/42 is 30% heavier (558 kg / 1,230 lb) than the Renault R-57 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources