New Holland TS 110 (A) or VALMET 6800-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 6800-4: maximum permissible mass.

  • The VALMET 6800-4 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for New Holland TS 110 (A) and VALMET 6800-4, with the call on each
QuestionTS 110 (A)6800-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?72.6 kW (97.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”73.0 kW (97.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TS 110 (A) and the 6800-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TS 110 (A) and the 6800-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?79.0 L/min (20.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,520 kg (7,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6800-4.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,949 kg (8,706 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6800-4 is 12% heavier (461 kg / 1,016 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”AheadThe VALMET 6800-4 has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TS 110 (A) and the 6800-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TS 110 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20031996–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 6800-4 is 12% heavier (461 kg / 1,016 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 6800-4 has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources