New Holland TN 60 DA/SA or Steyr 360 Kompakt?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TN 60 DA/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 360 Kompakt has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Steyr 360 Kompakt suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (5.1 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TN 60 DA/SA | 360 Kompakt | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TN 60 DA/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 360 Kompakt has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TN 60 DA/SA and the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TN 60 DA/SA and the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 52.1 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | AheadThe Steyr 360 Kompakt has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.1 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,435 kg (5,368 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,365 kg (5,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 360 Kompakt is 21% heavier (485 kg / 1,069 lb) than the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TN 60 DA/SA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TN 60 DA/SA and the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 430/540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | AheadThe New Holland TN 60 DA/SA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 360 Kompakt does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2008 | 2004–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 360 Kompakt has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.1 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 360 Kompakt is 21% heavier (485 kg / 1,069 lb) than the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TN 60 DA/SA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 360 Kompakt does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TN 60 DA/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 360 Kompakt has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources