New Holland TM 130 (Traktorenlexikon) or SAME Antares 130?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TM 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Antares 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TM 130 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 109% (62.4 L/min / 16.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 20% (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TM 130 | Antares 130 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 96.4 kW (129.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 96 kW (129 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TM 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Antares 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TM 130 and the Antares 130. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TM 130 and the Antares 130. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 119.5 L/min (31.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 57.1 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | AheadThe New Holland TM 130 has 109% more hydraulic flow (62.4 L/min / 16.5 gpm) than the SAME Antares 130 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,415 kg (14,143 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 5,350 kg (11,795 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | AheadThe New Holland TM 130 has 20% more lift (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) than the SAME Antares 130 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,480 kg (12,081 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 5,250 kg (11,574 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 24 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TM 130 and the Antares 130. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | 540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Antares 130. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 130”; OECD test report 2087, 2003 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2007 | 1991–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 130 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 130 has 109% more hydraulic flow (62.4 L/min / 16.5 gpm) than the SAME Antares 130 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 130 has 20% more lift (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) than the SAME Antares 130 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 130 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TM 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Antares 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources