New Holland TM 115 (Traktorenlexikon) or ZETOR 10641?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TM 115 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 79% (52.3 L/min / 13.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 13% (778 kg / 1,715 lb) more three-point lift.
- The New Holland TM 115 suits road haulage better on this data: 27% (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TM 115 | 10641 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TM 115 and the 10641. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TM 115 and the 10641. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 118.3 L/min (31.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | AheadThe New Holland TM 115 has 79% more hydraulic flow (52.3 L/min / 13.8 gpm) than the ZETOR 10641 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,560 kg (14,462 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | AheadThe New Holland TM 115 has 13% more lift (778 kg / 1,715 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,334 kg (11,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 4,075 kg (8,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 115 is 31% heavier (1,259 kg / 2,776 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | AheadThe New Holland TM 115 has 27% higher maximum permissible mass (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TM 115 and the 10641. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”; OECD test report 1917, 2000 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1999–2002 | 1999–2002 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 115 has 79% more hydraulic flow (52.3 L/min / 13.8 gpm) than the ZETOR 10641 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 115 has 13% more lift (778 kg / 1,715 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 115 is 31% heavier (1,259 kg / 2,776 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 115 has 27% higher maximum permissible mass (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources