New Holland TL 100 (A) or Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ: three-point lift and maximum permissible mass. It is also ahead on forward gears.
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 123% (4,760 kg / 10,494 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TL 100 (A) | Ares 546 RX/RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 61.1 kW (81.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 61.2 kW (82.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TL 100 (A) and the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TL 100 (A) and the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,880 kg (8,554 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 8,640 kg (19,048 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 123% more lift (4,760 kg / 10,494 lb) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,765 kg (8,300 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 5,165 kg (11,387 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ is 37% heavier (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 7,760 kg (17,108 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TL 100 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL100” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2004 | 2002–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 123% more lift (4,760 kg / 10,494 lb) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ is 37% heavier (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the New Holland TL 100 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources