New Holland TJ-375 or New Holland TJ-380?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the New Holland TJ-375 is ahead on top speed.

  • The New Holland TJ-375 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for New Holland TJ-375 and New Holland TJ-380, with the call on each
QuestionTJ-375TJ-380Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?252.0 kW (337.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”258.8 kW (347.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TJ-375 and the TJ-380.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TJ-375 and the TJ-380.
Which pumps more oil for implements?154.8 L/min (40.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”153.7 L/min (40.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,905 kg (19,632 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”8,905 kg (19,632 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?17,064 kg (37,620 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”18,951 kg (41,780 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TJ-380 is 11% heavier (1,887 kg / 4,160 lb) than the New Holland TJ-375 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?18,000 kg (39,683 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TJ-380.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
Which is faster on the road?35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”AheadThe New Holland TJ-375 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the New Holland TJ-380 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TJ-375 and the TJ-380.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ375”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2001–20052005–2007EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TJ-380 is 11% heavier (1,887 kg / 4,160 lb) than the New Holland TJ-375 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TJ-375 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the New Holland TJ-380 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources