New Holland T 8020 or Renault Altes 936 RZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the T 8020 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Altes 936 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault Altes 936 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (3,124 kg / 6,887 lb) more three-point lift.
- The New Holland T 8020 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | T 8020 | Altes 936 RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 182.4 kW (244.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the T 8020 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Altes 936 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the T 8020 and the Altes 936 RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the T 8020 and the Altes 936 RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 166.6 L/min (44.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Altes 936 RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,126 kg (20,119 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 12,250 kg (27,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | AheadThe Renault Altes 936 RZ has 34% more lift (3,124 kg / 6,887 lb) than the New Holland T 8020 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 9,727 kg (21,444 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 9,720 kg (21,429 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 12,350 kg (27,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | AheadThe New Holland T 8020 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Renault Altes 936 RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 19 to 23Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T 8020 and the Altes 936 RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8020” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2006–2011 | 2001–2005 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 8020 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Altes 936 RZ has 34% more lift (3,124 kg / 6,887 lb) than the New Holland T 8020 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 8020 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Renault Altes 936 RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 8020 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the T 8020 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Altes 936 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources