New Holland T 6020 Delta (Traktorenlexikon) or VALMET 6800-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland T 6020 Delta: maximum permissible mass.

  • The New Holland T 6020 Delta suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for New Holland T 6020 Delta (Traktorenlexikon) and VALMET 6800-4, with the call on each
QuestionT 6020 Delta6800-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?72.0 kW (96.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”73.0 kW (97.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the T 6020 Delta and the 6800-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the T 6020 Delta and the 6800-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the T 6020 Delta.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,997 kg (13,221 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6800-4.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,720 kg (10,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”AheadThe New Holland T 6020 Delta has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the VALMET 6800-4 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T 6020 Delta and the 6800-4.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T 6020 Delta.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6020 Delta”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2007–20121996–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 6020 Delta is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland T 6020 Delta has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the VALMET 6800-4 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland T 6020 Delta is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources