New Holland T 5070 or VALMET 6800-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 6800-4: hydraulic flow.

  • The VALMET 6800-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (15.3 L/min / 4.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for New Holland T 5070 and VALMET 6800-4, with the call on each
QuestionT 50706800-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.1 kW (100.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”73.0 kW (97.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the T 5070 and the 6800-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the T 5070 and the 6800-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?65.0 L/min (17.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”AheadThe VALMET 6800-4 has 24% more hydraulic flow (15.3 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the New Holland T 5070 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,740 kg (12,655 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6800-4.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,400 kg (16,314 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6800-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 5070”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2009–20121996–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5070 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 6800-4 has 24% more hydraulic flow (15.3 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the New Holland T 5070 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland T 5070 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources