New Holland-Fiat G 170 or Renault 180-94 TZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland-Fiat G 170 suits road haulage better on this data: 18% (1,750 kg / 3,858 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for New Holland-Fiat G 170 and Renault 180-94 TZ, with the call on each
QuestionG 170180-94 TZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 170 and the 180-94 TZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 170 and the 180-94 TZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?125.6 L/min (33.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”59.9 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe New Holland-Fiat G 170 has 110% more hydraulic flow (65.7 L/min / 17.4 gpm) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,197 kg (15,867 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”11,020 kg (24,295 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 53% more lift (3,823 kg / 8,428 lb) than the New Holland-Fiat G 170 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?7,622 kg (16,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”6,237 kg (13,750 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland-Fiat G 170 is 22% heavier (1,385 kg / 3,053 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”9,750 kg (21,495 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe New Holland-Fiat G 170 has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (1,750 kg / 3,858 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”27Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 50% more forward gears (9 gears) than the New Holland-Fiat G 170 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 170 and the 180-94 TZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–20031991–1997EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland-Fiat G 170 has 110% more hydraulic flow (65.7 L/min / 17.4 gpm) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ has 53% more lift (3,823 kg / 8,428 lb) than the New Holland-Fiat G 170 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland-Fiat G 170 is 22% heavier (1,385 kg / 3,053 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland-Fiat G 170 has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (1,750 kg / 3,858 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ has 50% more forward gears (9 gears) than the New Holland-Fiat G 170 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources