New Holland 9282 (Traktorenlexikon) or WHITE 4-270?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9282 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4-270 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The WHITE 4-270 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9282 | 4-270 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 191.2 kW (256.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | 198.6 kW (266.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9282 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4-270 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9282 and the 4-270. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9282 and the 4-270. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 165.7 L/min (43.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 4-270. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,170 kg (20,216 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | 5,672 kg (12,505 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 9282: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282”); the 4-270: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 11,327 kg (24,972 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | 13,705 kg (30,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 4-270 is 21% heavier (2,378 kg / 5,243 lb) than the New Holland 9282 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 13,254 kg (29,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4-270. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | AheadThe WHITE 4-270 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the New Holland 9282 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9282 and the 4-270. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | AheadThe WHITE 4-270 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the New Holland 9282 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9282. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WD / 4WD, equal wheelsTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282”; OECD test report 1885, 2000 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-270” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–1999 | 1983–1988 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 9282 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 4-270 is 21% heavier (2,378 kg / 5,243 lb) than the New Holland 9282 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 4-270 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the New Holland 9282 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 4-270 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the New Holland 9282 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 9282 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9282 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4-270 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 9282: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9282”); the 4-270: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources