New Holland 4835 (A) or ZETOR Proxima 70 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR Proxima 70 (A): hydraulic flow.
- The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 4835 (A) | Proxima 70 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 41.8 kW (56.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4835 (A) and the Proxima 70 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4835 (A) and the Proxima 70 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 50.0 L/min (13.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | AheadThe ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) has 12% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the New Holland 4835 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Proxima 70 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,910 kg (8,620 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 4835 (A) is 17% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Proxima 70 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Proxima 70 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Proxima 70 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–1998 | 2011–2016 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) has 12% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the New Holland 4835 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 4835 (A) is 17% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources