New Holland 3235 or URSUS 2812?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland 3235 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 86% (16.2 L/min / 4.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 24% (324 kg / 714 lb) more three-point lift.
- The New Holland 3235 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 3235 | 2812 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3235 and the 2812. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3235 and the 2812. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 18.8 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe New Holland 3235 has 86% more hydraulic flow (16.2 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the URSUS 2812 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,690 kg (3,726 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 1,366 kg (3,012 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe New Holland 3235 has 24% more lift (324 kg / 714 lb) than the URSUS 2812 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,720 kg (3,792 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 2,020 kg (4,453 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 2812 is 17% heavier (300 kg / 661 lb) than the New Holland 3235 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3235 and the 2812. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe New Holland 3235 has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the URSUS 2812 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2812. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe New Holland 3235 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 2812 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2812. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–1999 | 1988–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 3235 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland 3235 has 86% more hydraulic flow (16.2 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the URSUS 2812 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 3235 has 24% more lift (324 kg / 714 lb) than the URSUS 2812 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 2812 is 17% heavier (300 kg / 661 lb) than the New Holland 3235 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 3235 has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the URSUS 2812 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 3235 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 2812 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 3235 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources