Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler or SOMECA 1880 (TD)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1880 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler and SOMECA 1880 (TD), with the call on each
QuestionMB-trac 1800 intercooler1880 (TD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?132 kW (177 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”132.4 kW (177.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1880 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler and the 1880 (TD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler and the 1880 (TD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?57.0 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1880 (TD).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”5,900 kg (13,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MB-trac 1800 intercooler: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”); the 1880 (TD): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,350 kg (13,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which has the wider choice of gears?14Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1880 (TD).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”AheadThe Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the SOMECA 1880 (TD) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”AheadThe Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 1880 (TD) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19911979–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the SOMECA 1880 (TD) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 1880 (TD) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1880 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MB-trac 1800 intercooler: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”); the 1880 (TD): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1880”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources