Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100 or VALMET 905-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100 and VALMET 905-4, with the call on each
QuestionMB trac 1100905-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?71.3 kW (95.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”71.8 kW (96.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MB trac 1100 and the 905-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MB trac 1100 and the 905-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.3 L/min (11.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”47.5 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”4,190 kg (9,237 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MB trac 1100: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”); the 905-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,540 kg (12,214 lb) to 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”4,130 kg (9,105 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100 is 34% heavier (1,410 kg / 3,109 lb) than the VALMET 905-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MB trac 1100 and the 905-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?14Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”14 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MB trac 1100 and the 905-4.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MB trac 1100.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19861984–1989Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 905-4 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100 is 34% heavier (1,410 kg / 3,109 lb) than the VALMET 905-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 905-4 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MB trac 1100: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1100”); the 905-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources