MASSEY-HARRIS Pony 820 vs Warchalowski WT-21
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the Pony 820 and the WT-21 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Pony 820 | WT-21 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 18.0 hp | 17.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | HANOMAG D 621-E 54 | WARCHALOWSKI D-22 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.02 L | 1.15 L | +12% WT-21 |
| Maximum torque declared | 58 lb·ft · 78 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 9.3 mph · 15 km/h | 17.4 mph · 28 km/h | +87% WT-21 |
| Clutch declared | — | pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 2.5 gpm · 9.5 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 1,874 lb · 850 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 534 rpm | 540/700 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,315 lb · 1,050 kg | 1,885 lb · 855 kg | +23% Pony 820 |
| Wheelbase declared | 67.3 in · 1,710 mm | 71.3 in · 1,810 mm | +6% WT-21 |
| Length declared | 110.2 in · 2,800 mm | 113.0 in · 2,870 mm | — |
| Width declared | 56.0 in · 1,422 mm | 57.5 in · 1,460 mm | — |
| Height declared | 60.0 in · 1,524 mm | 57.1 in · 1,450 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.5 in · 470 mm | 18.1 in · 460 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 7.5 ft · 2.30 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 27.5 qt · 26.0 L | 22.2 qt · 21.0 L | +24% Pony 820 |
MASSEY-HARRIS Pony 820 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris Pony 820”
Warchalowski WT-21 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20”