MASSEY-HARRIS 202 vs SAME DA 38 (DT)

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1940–1942

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1952–1957

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 202 and the DA 38 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

MASSEY-HARRIS 202 and SAME DA 38 (DT), field by field
Field	202	DA 38 (DT)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	36.5 hp	37.4 hp	—
Engine declared	CONTINENTAL M-290	SAME DA 1103	differs
Displacement declared	4.75 L	3.42 L	+39% 202
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+25% DA 38 (DT)
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry Borg & Beck single plate clutch	Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	3.0 gpm · 11.5 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	711 psi · 49.0 bar	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	585 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,499 lb · 2,948 kg	4,806 lb · 2,180 kg	+35% 202
Wheelbase declared	89.0 in · 2,261 mm	74.8 in · 1,900 mm	+19% 202
Length declared	139.5 in · 3,543 mm	117.7 in · 2,990 mm	+18% 202
Width declared	69.0 in · 1,753 mm	68.1 in · 1,730 mm	—
Height declared	59.3 in · 1,505 mm	68.1 in · 1,730 mm	+15% DA 38 (DT)
Ground clearance declared	12.8 in · 324 mm	14.8 in · 375 mm	+16% DA 38 (DT)
Fuel tank declared	120.5 qt · 114.0 L	38.0 qt · 36.0 L	+217% 202

Source

Source