MASSEY-HARRIS 202 vs RÖHR R 35
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 202 and the R 35 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 202 | R 35 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 36.5 hp | 35.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | CONTINENTAL M-290 | MWM KD 215 D | differs |
| Displacement declared | 4.75 L | 3.53 L | +34% 202 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry Borg & Beck single plate clutch | Pedal operated dry single plate clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,499 lb · 2,948 kg | 4,167 lb · 1,890 kg | +56% 202 |
| Wheelbase declared | 89.0 in · 2,261 mm | 76.4 in · 1,940 mm | +17% 202 |
| Length declared | 139.5 in · 3,543 mm | 122.8 in · 3,120 mm | +14% 202 |
| Width declared | 69.0 in · 1,753 mm | 61.0 in · 1,550 mm | +13% 202 |
| Height declared | 59.3 in · 1,505 mm | 66.9 in · 1,700 mm | +13% R 35 |
| Ground clearance declared | 12.8 in · 324 mm | 13.8 in · 350 mm | +8% R 35 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 120.5 qt · 114.0 L | 31.7 qt · 30.0 L | +280% 202 |
MASSEY-HARRIS 202 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 202”
RÖHR R 35 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Röhr R 35”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Titus U 35”